The world of superheroes has seen many different characters
over the course of its history but if there’s someone who challenges the views
of most of them, is the antihero called The Punisher.
Created by Gerry Conway in 1974 in the pages of “The Amazing Spider-Man #129”, Frank Castle was introduced as a mercenary who was hunting Spider-Man because he was suspect of the murder of Norman Osborn (which obviously was a mistake). The basics of the character were quickly established, he was an antihero who was decided to end with the criminal world and injustice in the planet.
However, it was pretty clear that Conway really didn’t have
a clear idea about where he wanted to take the character. The characterization
for Frank during this little story was pretty simplistic which is
understandable since Conway’s original plans were about to make an one-note
antagonist for Peter Parker to fight, he really wasn’t expecting the character
to take-off to the point that he would become a pretty popular figure in the
following years.
There are a few traits that contradict what future writers
decided to talk about like how Conway didn't really want to portray The
Punisher as a cold-hearted killer and instead depicted him as a mercenary
who had a certain code of honor and believed in justice (which people familiar
with recent takes on the character would say that is completely wrong). That
being said, there are certain aspects that would actually stick like when Frank
mentions that he’s fighting “a lonely war” and “Sometimes I wonder if evil has
rubbed off on me” which are surprisingly deep dilemmas for someone who just was
supposed to appear in a single issue.
Frank Castle continually appeared along with other Marvel
characters over the years, most notably during Frank Miller’s legendary
Daredevil run in which the connection and rivalry between both characters was
cemented by depicting Matt Murdock as a firm believer in the justice
system and Frank as the complete opposite of that.
Is also necessary to mention that during this time the antihero received his own “nemesis” called “Jigsaw” who was a formerly handsome gangster who got disfigured after an encounter with Frank. I use the term “nemesis” really lightly by the way since, despite that Jigsaw was originally conceived with that role in mind, he never really did anything to actually deserve such status and most of the stories where he appeared were rather forgettable.
The Punisher eventually received the spotlight in a
miniseries written by Steven Grant in 1986 which told the story of how Frank
finally ended-up prison and pretty much defined the idea that sending The
Punisher to prison is always a bad one. As you might imagine putting a known
murderer of criminals in a place full of them can only go so well and Frank
obviously starts causing chaos until he finally finds the objective he was
looking for. The series itself was decent enough and touched interesting themes
about the character but at the same time it also tried to sorta redeem him in a
way by mentioning how his most violent acts up to date were because of a drug
which simply betrays his premise.
The miniseries proved to be popular though and launched an
ongoing book written by Mike Baron that lasted 104 issues. Just like many of
Baron’s stories, things could be described this way: Interesting ideas, dull
execution. What I mean by this is that I love a lot of the concepts that Baron
came up with (The Punisher as a social studies professor? How can you not love
that?) but sadly his craft never managed to put the series as anything beyond
“decent”. It still was an improvement over his other books and his run lasted
for a while for that reason, although some might say that it lasted for too
long since Baron is also responsible for the infamous story where Frank becomes
a black man for reasons that are hard to explain.
The late 80s and early 90s is considered the most popular time for the character not only for how long his main series lasted but also because he also received two spinoffs books titled “The Punisher: War Zone” and “The Punisher: War Journal” and introduced relevant supporting characters like Micro who became The Punisher’s partner for most of this era, not even a character with much better written stories like Daredevil received such treatment but in retrospective it makes sense. This was the boom of violent heroes and if there’s someone who perfectly fits into that definition is The Punisher. Sadly, this didn’t translate into memorable stories but things would change rather quickly… just to change into mediocrity once again.
You see, The Punisher received several one-shots during the
early 90s, most of them were unremarkable but there was a particular story that
marked an important moment for the character. The story was called “The Punisher
Kills the Marvel Universe” which pretty much tells you exactly what you can
expect from it but the premise is not what is important, what matters is who
worked on it: Garth Ennis.
As most comic fans should know, Garth Ennis has worked on
some of the most legendary stories in the medium, his whole list of work
includes such outstanding titles like Hellblazer, Hitman, Preacher and many
more so the idea of working on a character whose defining trait was that he
killed criminals was something intriguing, something that could finally be
expanded into an actual complex exploration of what made this murderer the kind of
person he is.
Unfortunately, that didn’t happen right away. “The Punisher
Kills the Marvel Universe” was Garth Ennis at his most basic. Ennis has a
complete dislike for superheroes, he considers the genre, characters and to an
extend, the audience, ridiculous and this is clearly seen in this story. The
premise was about how superheroes accidently caused the death of Frank’s family
which is an interesting idea in and of itself considering how collateral damage
wasn’t something really explored during the 90s. However, this mostly serves as
an excuse for Ennis to see most of the heroes from the Marvel universe getting
killed by The Punisher, that’s the whole plot.
That doesn’t mean that there isn’t any salvageable aspects
though since a few important concepts that Ennis would use in the future appear
here. For example, Frank was portrayed as a cold and inhuman being who barely
showed any emotion aside from rage which was something that not many writers
were consistent about. Second, he defined the connection between The Punisher
and Daredevil right away and funnily enough, Daredevil has always been one of
the few superheroes that Ennis has treated with some sort of respect (Possibly
because of Frank Miller’s influential run). Third and most importantly, he
showed that at the end killing doesn’t really solve anything and that Frank’s
mission is always bound to conclude badly.
These were definitely interesting themes despite of being
trapped in a simplistic plot. Such concepts could have been further explored to
actually create a quintessential interpretation of the character but sadly,
another change was forced for the following years.
The late 90s were not as fond of antiheroes as the early
parts of the decade and sales for The Punisher started to decline to the point
where all of his series were cancelled. Not all was lost though since Marvel
found new success in their recent “Marvel Knights” imprint which consisted of
outsourcing some of their characters to other creators (One of the most notable
examples being Kevin Smith’s Daredevil run) and thus they decided to give the
reigns of The Punisher to Christopher Golden with less than mixed results.
The Punisher: Purgatory was released in 1998, a miniseries
that told the story about how Frank finally died just to be hired by angels to
kill for them and ultimately redeem himself. Credit where credit is due, this
is not a bad idea per se, the notion of The Punisher becoming an angel of
vengeance and dealing with supernatural enemies had potential that could have
been exploited by any competent writer to create an unique incarnation of the
antihero.
That didn’t happen here though. The Punisher: Purgatory is
the most maligned era of the character and with good reasons. The major problem
was that the writer decided to rewrite Frank’s origin and force the angels into
it to the point where the reason why Frank’s family died was because “their
guardian angel didn’t save them” which is such an unnecessary change that feels
out of place for Frank’s history and most importantly, denigrated the idea
about how crime was the reason why his family died.
That's far from the only issue since this story also presented
an overly-emotional Frank who tended to be portrayed almost like any normal person who was supposed to be sympathetic due to the loss of his family
and again, it also contradicted previous portrayals and went against his own
characterization.
On the other hand, this change didn’t last long due that
Marvel quickly realized their mistake and hired Garth Ennis once again in 2000.
The premise was simple, a “back to basics” direction for The Punisher in which
we would basically ignore everything that happened in the 90s, meaning no extreme
guns, Micro and supernatural powers. In fact Ennis explained why Frank stopped
being an angel in a pretty simple, effective and profound way that gave a
complete new insight of the character.
Is worth mentioning that this is basically the first time
where Ennis would explore what actually happens inside of Frank’s mind, about
how the death of his family might not be the reason why he became the person he
is. Such question remained during the rest of Ennis' work on the character and
turned out to be a pretty complex insight of a man who was born very
different from others.
While pretty good, this story is not perfect. Ennis tended
to go for his overly-silly traits quite quickly which in some ways worked
against the complexity that he tried to give to the title (Polar bears and goofy villains come to mind). However, it was still the revitalization the
character needed after being treated so badly for almost a decade.
Unfortunately, Ennis himself wouldn’t be able to repeat his
luck the next time he relaunched the book in 2001 which lasted 37 issues and
sadly, didn’t match the quality of the last volume. Ennis became even sillier
in this series where he constantly made fun of Marvel’s superheroes
(Wolverine’s fans were not happy about the caricaturesque portrayal he received
here) and not even Daredevil was safe from being ridiculed (He still was most
respectfully portrayed in comparison though). The writer even made other
characters he created in the last series who received a satisfying ending very
miserable.
There were decent moments since Ennis offered some of his
trademarked real life stories that were touching at times but he wrote so many
silly tales that made both styles clash really badly and overall, this book
lasted for too long telling basically the same joke.
Not all was lost nonetheless, since Ennis himself realized
that his cartoony stories were actually disrespectful for the character and in
2003 he delivered was is possibly the most defining story about Frank Castle.
“Born” was a 4 issue miniseries where Garth Ennis explored the actual origin of
The Punisher, I don’t mean the moment his family died but the moment
where he became the murder machine he’s known today and doomed himself for the
rest of his life.
Ennis always had a certain preference for war stories, most
of his most famous books contain those elements and this series allowed him to
indulge himself. The plot takes place in the Vietnam War, a pretty important
time in Frank’s life which was hinted at several times in the past but it was
never explored as profoundly as here. Told from the perspective of a simple
soldier, we learn about Captain Castle and the terrifying thoughts that occur
inside of his head. Ennis plays with the idea that something is wrong with
Frank, something is constantly pushing him towards the edge and is something
that is not human-related. The story escalates powerfully towards the
inevitable end where Frank loses himself and swears to fight an eternal war by
paying the ultimate price.
Including war themes, social commentary and with a little
hint of supernatural aspects, Ennis’ “Born” quickly became an automatic
fan-favorite book which made the audience ask for more and thankfully they
didn’t have to wait much.
“Punisher MAX” was released in 2004. An out of continuity
series where Garth Ennis decided to create the perfect timeline for the
antihero. Unlike regular Marvel books which were constantly updating themselves
to reflect current times, the “MAX” imprint had the firm idea of keeping the
timeline fixed, that way Frank always fought in the Vietnam War and he aged in
real time. In fact the plot tends to focus on how The Punisher is getting older
and story after story we start to realize how he’s actually getting weaker
and his end might come at any time.
One of the most relevant differences from Ennis’ previous
books was that this was a series firmly cemented in reality, meaning no silly
ideas, humour or encounter with superheroes. The writer was so obsessed with
this serious direction that the only Marvel character Frank had contact with
was Nick Fury and considering how similar their backgrounds are, it made sense.
This route worked splendidly since the idea of The Punisher
is much better executed when it tries to deal with serious topics like crime,
war, racial conflicts, human trafficking among other of the worst acts that
this world can present without surreal elements that work against them. Just
from the beginning when one of the characters screams “Motherf*cker”, you just
know that you’re not reading your usual superhero comic. If “Born” defined
Frank Castle’s origin, “MAX” defined the rest of his life.
And that is far from the only excellent work that Ennis
would do in this tone. One can’t forget the one-shot stories he released.
“Punisher: The End” was a story about the last days of Frank Castle where he has
to deal with the heartbreaking ramifications of a inevitable war that caused
the apocalypse. “Punisher: The Cell” was a fantastic and suspenseful tale
about how Frank once again ends in prison, if his first miniseries proved that
incarcerating The Punisher was a bad idea, then this story showed is the worst
thing that you can do. “Punisher: The Tyger” finally revealed Frank’s childhood
and how there always was something eerie about him, Ennis had the good sense of
emphasizing that this didn’t automatically made him a bad person but still, had
the potential to become really dangerous at any second.
Then after this Ennis would return to the usual Marvel
continuity to write yet another miniseries that deals with a few characters
from his first book in the franchise. It was silly, unremarkable and simply
wasn’t worth mentioning.
“Punisher: MAX” eventually received a spiritual sequel
written by Jason Aaron in 2010 and tells the unavoidable conclusion of this
incarnation of the character. Unlike Ennis though, Aaron implemented other
characters from the Marvel universe to serve as antagonists like Kingpin, Bullseye
and Elektra which were solidly incorporated into the title and in some cases, uniquely depicted but didn’t
contrast well with the ultra-realistic environment that Ennis created. Not to
mention that at times it seemed like Aaron was trying too hard to emulate
Ennis’ style, particularly the swearing which in Ennis’ writing seems natural
while in Aaron’s work just seems forced.
Nonetheless, Aaron still knew how to create a logical
development for the cold and inhuman being that Ennis portrayed and went even
further at times, all of this leading to a strong finale that just felt
appropriate.
While I maintain that the best stories about The Punisher
are the ones that are out of continuity, the character still received solid
efforts from writers like Greg Rucka and Rick Remender, the latter deserves a
honorable mention because it created one of the most unique directions in the
title’s history where he actually murders Frank in one of the bloodiest scenes
ever depicted in the comics and revives him as a monster appropriately named “FrankenCastle”.
He eventually got better of course.
Those are some of the most relevant events that have
occurred in the life of one of Marvel’s most famous antiheroes. The Punisher
had the luck of having some of the most memorable stories in the comic medium
and they have perfectly summarized their personality.
Frank Castle is not a hero, I know I’ve been calling him an
“antihero” quite a few times in this column but even that might be selling him
short. In some incarnations he has been called a “force of nature” and that
might or might not be true but what I’m completely certain is that he’s no
human being. Frank Castle was born different, in a way that provoked a doomed
fate for him, the death of his family is often considered just an excuse for
him to simply be free but at the same time you could see that at least he tried
to love them, he tried to be human.
That kind of effort is what differentiates him from a simple
monster and turns him into a complex being, one that has an urge to cause harm
to others but still has the strength to direct that hate to the people who
truly deserve it. His story is never bound to end on a happy note though but at
least he won’t ever be stopped by any superhero since there’s only one way to
put him down and no self-respected hero is willing to take that choice.
The Punisher is not relatable, he’s no human, he’s not
supposed to be but that doesn’t mean he can’t be understandable, just
like some of the best characters.
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario